AMD: Developers Only Use PhysX for the Money

AMD took a hook at industry rival Nvidia today, expression that game developers only make use of the GPU maker's PhysX platform because they're being "paid to practice it."

PhysX, for those who don't make out, is a proprietary natural philosophy engine owned by Nvidia which supports hardware quickening through either a PhysX PPU (natural philosophy processing unit) Oregon, much commonly, a CUDA-enabled GeForce graphics card. AMD, meanwhile, has down its weight behind a competing platform, the Open Physics Initiative, which it claims is supreme because information technology doesn't "shut away users to any single platform." Some systems offer interlacing, realistic physics in videogames, but Nvidia has taken a considerable lead in the race to become the de facto standard.

But AMD's Richard Huddy says that has much to do with Nvidia buying its room to the top than with the actual upper-class of its physics engine. "What I've seen with physics, or PhysX rather, is that Nvidia make over a marketing deal with a title, and and so as part of that marketing deal, they have the right to go in and implement PhysX in the game," Huddy, AMD's senior manager of developer relations, told Thinq.

"[Developers] are non doing it because they want it; they're doing it because they'rhenium paid to do it," he said. "So we have a rather artificial situation at the moment where you see PhysX in games, but it International Relations and Security Network't because the game developer wants it in there."

Huddy compared Nvidia's draw near with PhysX to 3dfx's Glide platform, an early 3-D acceleration API that was at length surpassed by the more than open Direct3D and OpenGL platforms. "I think the proprietary stuff will sooner or later go away," he same. "If you go back ten years operating room so to when Glide by was there as a proprietary 3D graphics API, it could have coexisted, but instead of putting their effort into getting D3D to go well, 3dfx focused along Gliding. Atomic number 3 a result, they found themselves competing with a copyrighted standard against an open standard, and they lost. IT's the way it is with many another of the standards we operate with."

AMD's biggest problem at the instant is that nobelium games support the Assailable Physics Initiative, while dozens of titles offer some degree of PhysX effectuation. On the other hand, sticking with the graphics analogy, 3dfx jumped out to an early lead in 3-D artwork acceleration, still I'd be willing to bet on that some of you had never even heard of Glide before reading this, so it's non necessarily an insurmountable obstacle.

But what Crataegus oxycantha really take the air current out of AMD's sails is the fact that Nvidia has previously committed to qualification PhysX an open platform as well, with the SDK freely available to gimpy developers and even competing art crisp makers. Unfortunately, or at least ironically, the only another GPU manufacturer of note is ATI – which is owned by AMD.

Irrespective of who comes out on top, an unresolved standard would Be improve for everyone and AMD plans to make its case for the Open Physics Initiative at this year's Game Developers Group discussion, which began today. "When you have an open standard, everyone can junction in and everyone can make free and well-knowing choices," Huddy said, "and IT's non astir skewing the market with money."

https://www.escapistmagazine.com/amd-developers-only-use-physx-for-the-money/

Source: https://www.escapistmagazine.com/amd-developers-only-use-physx-for-the-money/

Share this post